Unknown clubGenoa CFC · Permanent · Summer 2026

Confirmedhe is in the squad at his new club · 3mo ago
88%
final reading before it was settled
first reported 3mo agolast moved 3mo ago
  1. Rumoured
    30 Jun
  2. Talks
    30 Jun
  3. Agreement
    1 Jul
  4. Medical
    2 Jul
  5. Done
    2 Jul

Catch me up

  1. 30 Junfirst@MatteMoretto: itLeft-back David Puczka involved in Jeff Ekhator deal between Juventus and Genoa
  2. 30 JunJoined by @FabrizioRomano, @DiMarzio
  3. 1 JulReached Agreement
  4. 2 JulReached Medical
  5. 2 JulReached Done

What was actually said

6 posts in 4 claims, grouped by stage and direction.

Reported at medical stage

Advancingone report

itMedical examinations have begun with Genoa

JournalistTier 2weighted 0.55claims MedicalView on X ↗

Reported as agreed

Advancingone report
JournalistTier 1seeded, not yet measuredclaims AgreementView on X ↗

Reported as being in talks

Advancing3 reports, led by @FabrizioRomano@MatteMoretto had it first, 3mo ago
JournalistTier 1seeded, not yet measuredclaims TalksView on X ↗
2 other posts, 2 other sources on the same claim
  • @MatteMoretto3mo ago

    itLeft-back David Puczka involved in Jeff Ekhator deal between Juventus and Genoa

    Juventus e Genoa sono in stretto contatto per definire l’operazione Jeff Ekhator, valutato intorno ai 18 milioni di euro. Nell’operazione rientrerebbero sia il portiere Giovanni Daffara sia il terzino sinistro David Puczka.

  • @DiMarzio3mo ago

    itContacts ongoing between Juventus and Genoa over Puczka

    Proseguono anche in questi minuti i contatti tra @juventusfc e @GenoaCFC sull’asse Ekhator-Puczka: le ultime https://t.co/ELw0B1H83L https://t.co/SfZPQlUWIy

Reported as done

Advancingone report

itPuczka is officially a new Genoa player

JournalistTier 2seeded, not yet measuredclaims DoneView on X ↗

Why it read 88% before it settled

Starting pointbefore any evidence, from the stage reached
+88
1 further reporteach worth under half a point
Completion probability
88%

Each report is weighted by how often its source has been right.

Probability over time

Not enough history yet. The line appears after a few recalculations.