Udinese → Watford · Permanent · Summer 2026

✓ Confirmedhe is in the squad at his new club · 4mo ago
88%
final reading before it was settled
first reported 4mo agolast moved 4mo ago
  1. Rumoured
    17 Jul
  2. Talks
    17 Jul
  3. Agreement
    20 Jul
  4. Medical
    —
  5. Done
    23 Jul

Catch me up

  1. 17 Julfirst@DiMarzio: Watford considering Iker Bravo from Udinese
  2. 17 JulReached Talks
  3. 20 JulReached Agreement
  4. 23 JulReached Done
  5. 24 JulJoined by @JacobsBen

What was actually said

6 posts in 4 claims, grouped by stage and direction.

Reported as done

Advancing3 reports, led by @DiMarzio@DiMarzio had it first, 4mo ago

itIker Bravo officially becomes a Watford FC player from Udinese

.@Udinese_1896, Iker Bravo è ufficialmente un nuovo giocatore del @WatfordFC https://t.co/GBSuiQLhqf

claims DoneView on X ↗
2 other posts, 1 other source on the same claim
  • @JacobsBen4mo ago ↗

    Watford confirm Spain Under-21 international forward Iker Bravo has joined from Udinese on a three-year contract.🇪🇸 https://t.co/t3KpSEgc10

  • @DiMarzio4mo ago ↗

    itIker Bravo has signed with Watford

    Asse @Udinese_1896-@WatfordFC: Iker Bravo ha firmato con gli inglesi. Payero in queste ore completerà le visite mediche. Zemura, operazione ai dettagli

Reported as agreed

Advancingone report

Iker Bravo a Londra per finalizzare l'accordo col @WatfordFC. Operazione a titolo definitivo

claims AgreementView on X ↗

Mentioned, no claim either way

Neutralone report

.@WatfordFC , idea Iker Bravo dall’@Udinese_1896

claims RumouredView on X ↗

Reported as being in talks

Advancingone report

itIker Bravo transfer to Watford progressing

Asse @Udinese_1896-@WatfordFC: non solo Iker Bravo. Vicino il trasferimento in Inghilterra anche per Payero e Zemura https://t.co/2UTJg6Q4kB

claims TalksView on X ↗

Why it read 88% before it settled

Starting pointbefore any evidence, from the stage reached
+88
3 further reportseach worth under half a point
Completion probability
88%

Each report is weighted by how often its source has been right.

Probability over time

Not enough history yet. The line appears after a few recalculations.