TransferHype
Winter 2027

Nathan Aké

DF

Manchester City → Fenerbahçe Istanbul · Permanent · Summer 2026

✓ Confirmedhe is in the squad at his new club · 4mo ago
99%
final reading before it was settled
first reported 4mo agolast moved 4mo ago
  1. Rumoured
    3 Jul
  2. Talks
    3 Jul
  3. Agreement
    3 Jul
  4. Medical
    —
  5. Done
    3 Jul

What was actually said

6 posts in 3 claims, grouped by stage and direction.

Reported as being in talks

Advancingone report

🚨🔵🟡 Nathan Ake’s move to Fenerbahçe will be on permanent deal from Manchester City. Fee worth £7m plus £1.5m in add-ons. Clubs in contact to finalise the agreement, that’s why there’s still no statement from Man City - as @Jack_Gaughan reports. https://t.co/g5kDLkgL4d

claims TalksView on X ↗

Reported as done

Advancing4 reports, led by @FabrizioRomano

🚨💛💙 Nathan Aké to Fenerbahçe, deal done and new centre back for the Turkish side! Aké wanted a new chapter after many years at Man City and terms with the player have also been agreed. https://t.co/24tRrR36wY

claims DoneView on X ↗
3 other posts, 3 other sources on the same claim
  • @DiMarzio4mo ago ↗

    itNathan Aké is a new Fenerbahce player

    Nathan Aké è un nuovo calciatore del @Fenerbahce: il comunicato ufficiale https://t.co/Frfg35fJIe

  • @JacobsBen4mo ago ↗

    Fenerbahçe confirm Nathan Ake has joined. £7m+£1.5m in add ons.✍️ https://t.co/OsPcShJY3D

  • @TEAMtalk4mo ago ↗

    Fenerbahce-bound Nathan Ake will leave Manchester City after an incredibly successful six years at the club 🏆 https://t.co/DYFRDsFuFV

Reported as agreed

Advancingone report

Fenerbahçe announce they have reached an agreement with Nathan Aké. Manchester City and Fenerbahçe are still finalising a fee, but an agreement is expected.🇳🇱 https://t.co/1EsEAc0IVO

claims AgreementView on X ↗

Why it read 99% before it settled

Starting pointbefore any evidence, from the stage reached
+99
3 further reportseach worth under half a point
Completion probability
99%

Each report is weighted by how often its source has been right.

Probability over time

Not enough history yet. The line appears after a few recalculations.